This sub has a bad habit of calling out athlete's probability of being on steroids simply based on the "appearance of gyno" But most of you have no clue what gyno looks like.
Gyno is: Swollen male *breast* tissue caused by a hormone imbalance. It is not: puffy nipples, red nipples, hard nipples, etc.
These are good examples of what gyno really looks like. When flexed (and even noticable without flexing in lean guys), there is a clear raised outline AROUND the nipple.
Here is another video showing obvious gyno in body builders. Again- it looks like the nipple is sitting upon a fleshy platform.
Here is a good side to side of what gyno looks like next to the same person without gyno. But in this sub, someone would see the slight difference in the guys nipples in the right photo and claim that is gyno. It is not. Know the difference.
Mr. Winklaar clearly uses, and even has a weird lump next to his right nipple- but in this pic he does not have gyno - There are pictures of him with gyno, but this is not one of them
Lastly; Gyno is not ALWAYS caused by gear, and just because someone has both a good physique and fatty deposits around their nips doesnt mean their on steroids. In body building and physique sports youll find a myriad of people who got into the sport because of a history of poor self esteem and even people who were overweight/obese during childhood and are trying to destroy that internal image of themselves. Gynocomastia is very prevalent in boys who are obese during puberty. In the US, as high as 20% of children ages 12-17 are obese.